From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 16, 2022
202 A.D.3d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2014–05296 Ind. No. 8742/12

02-16-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Randolph MURPHY, appellant.

Randolph Murphy, Napanoch, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.


Randolph Murphy, Napanoch, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 14, 2017 ( People v. Murphy, 151 A.D.3d 888, 53 N.Y.S.3d 835 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 1, 2014.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, ROMAN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 16, 2022
202 A.D.3d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Randolph MURPHY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 16, 2022

Citations

202 A.D.3d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
159 N.Y.S.3d 736