From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 22, 2021
200 A.D.3d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2019–13149 Ind. No. 4336/18

12-22-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Byron MURPHY, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Keith Dolan of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Keith Dolan of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed October 29, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 22, 2021
200 A.D.3d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Byron MURPHY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

200 A.D.3d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
155 N.Y.S.3d 787