Opinion
2014-10911
11-12-2015
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jazz MURPHY, appellant.
Marianne Karas, Thornwood, N.Y., for appellant. Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Cristin N. Connell of counsel; Konstantinos Litourgis on the brief), for respondent.
Marianne Karas, Thornwood, N.Y., for appellant.
Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Cristin N. Connell of counsel; Konstantinos Litourgis on the brief), for respondent.
Opinion Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered July 10, 2014, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly or voluntarily entered is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not move to vacate his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the Supreme Court (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Jackson, 114 A.D.3d 807, 979 N.Y.S.2d 704 ; People v. Folger, 110 A.D.3d 736, 971 N.Y.S.2d 890 ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here, as the defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime to which he pleaded guilty did not cast significant doubt on his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of the plea (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ; People v. Clarke, 124 A.D.3d 791, 791–792, 998 N.Y.S.2d 667 ; People v. Williams, 110 A.D.3d 746, 747, 972 N.Y.S.2d 94 ). In any event, the record of the plea proceedings reflects that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646 ; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16–17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170 ).
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, MALTESE and LaSALLE JJ., concur.