From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1999
257 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 14, 1999.

Appeal from the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.).


In June 1996, defendant was sentenced to, inter alia, five years' probation upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. After defendant was arrested on September 29, 1996 on new drug charges he was subsequently charged with and, following a hearing, found guilty of violating the terms of his probation. As a result, County Court revoked defendant's probation and sentenced him to a prison term of 4 to 12 years. Notably, at the hearing, defendant admitted, inter alia, that he drank alcohol and possessed marihuana on the date of his arrest. Considering defendant's prior drug-related conviction and his admission to violating the terms of his probation, and there being no extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention, we find the sentence, which was within the statutory parameters, neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Dalton, 247 A.D.2d 656).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1999
257 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER MURPHY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

State v. Provost

70; People v Soprano, 27 AD3d 964, 965). To the extent that defendant claims that hearsay evidence alone…

State v. Brown

Nevertheless, we find no merit to defendant's claim that the term of imprisonment imposed upon resentencing…