Opinion
February 24, 1986
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Both the photographic array viewed by the complainant and the circumstances surrounding the viewing thereof were not impermissibly suggestive. Therefore, the trial court did not err in denying that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the in-court identification by the complainant. Gibbons, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.