From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murillo

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Nov 6, 2017
2d Crim. No. B279925 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2017)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B279925

11-06-2017

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ MURILLO, Defendant and Appellant.

Heather E. Shallenberger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. 2015022205)
(Ventura County)

Jose Luis Ramirez Murillo appeals an order of probation granted after he expressly waived his constitutional rights and pleaded guilty to felony driving under the influence with prior driving under the influence convictions (count 1), and misdemeanor driving with a suspended or revoked driver's license (count 3), with an admission that his blood alcohol content was 0.15 percent or more. (Veh. Code, §§ 23550, 23152, subd. (a), 14601.5, subd. (a), 23578.) On October 16, 2016, in accordance with a plea agreement, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Murillo on formal probation for 36 months, with terms and conditions that included 365 days of confinement in county jail and payment of various fines and fees.

We appointed counsel to represent Murillo in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On August 14, 2017, we advised Murillo by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Murillo's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P. J. We concur:

YEGAN, J.

TANGEMAN, J.

Bruce A. Young, Judge


Superior Court County of Ventura

Heather E. Shallenberger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Summaries of

People v. Murillo

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Nov 6, 2017
2d Crim. No. B279925 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2017)
Case details for

People v. Murillo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ MURILLO…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Nov 6, 2017

Citations

2d Crim. No. B279925 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2017)