Opinion
June 20, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the verdict convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child was against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94; People v. White, 198 A.D.2d 388; People v. Kennedy, 185 A.D.2d 364). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Tardbania, 72 N.Y.2d 852; People v. Adams, 194 A.D.2d 680; People v. Ashe, 166 A.D.2d 655) or without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.