From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Muniz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1992
186 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 26, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who, during the plea allocution, admitted he acted as "lookout" for others whom he knew entered a commercial building and stole property, claims he has been sentenced for a crime he did not commit. That claim is not properly before us (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Gonzalez, 121 A.D.2d 562; see also, People v Riley, 120 A.D.2d 752), and, in any event, is without merit (see, People v Wright, 129 A.D.2d 600). Moreover, the record establishes that defendant was provided with meaningful legal representation (cf., People v Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852; see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Muniz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1992
186 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHNNY MUNIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)