From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Muneton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 18, 2003
302 A.D.2d 246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

180

February 18, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered March 26, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 15 years to life and 1 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

HILARY HASSLER, for Respondent.

STEVEN R. BERKO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Williams, Lerner, JJ.


Defendant's claim that voice identification evidence should have been precluded for lack of notice required by CPL 710.30(1)(b) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that although the notice should have been given (see People v. Collins, 60 N.Y.2d 214), the error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Muneton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 18, 2003
302 A.D.2d 246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Muneton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LETICIA MUNETON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 18, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 729

Citing Cases

People v. Ramos

The victim offered similar testimony at trial over defendant's objection. Because the People failed to…

People v. Perez

Defendant's argument that he was denied a fair trial due to the People's failure to give him CPL 710.30…