From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, defendant contends that he was denied the right to testify before the Grand Jury because he lacked legal representation between the felony hearing and arraignment. The record does not support that contention. If defendant wishes to develop a further record, his remedy is to make a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10.

Defendant also contends that reversal is required because he was absent from three bench conferences concerning prospective jurors (see, People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247, rearg denied 81 N.Y.2d 759). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant was denied his right to be present at all material stages of the trial, we conclude that reversal is not required because the prospective jurors were thereafter excused with defendant's consent (see, People v. Pritchard, 210 A.D.2d 937).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Moss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Moss

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD MOSS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 492