From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mosquera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 13, 2017
156 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2014–08722 Ind. No. 13–00195

12-13-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Emerson Pareja MOSQUERA, appellant.

James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Ellen O'Hara Woods of counsel), for appellant. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.


James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Ellen O'Hara Woods of counsel), for appellant.Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered September 9, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Muniz, 91 N.Y.2d 570, 575, 673 N.Y.S.2d 358, 696 N.E.2d 182 ) precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 9, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ).

DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mosquera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 13, 2017
156 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Mosquera

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Emerson Pareja MOSQUERA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 13, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
156 A.D.3d 728