Opinion
2019-08615 Ind. 10048/18
10-20-2021
The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Meredithe Morrow, appellant.
Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.
Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LINDA CHRISTOPHER, PAUL WOOTEN, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered January 11, 2019, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 340-342; People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256-257; People v Puccio, 191 A.D.3d 1022, 1022).
Although the defendant's contention regarding the voluntariness of her plea survives her valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10; People v Lujan, 114 A.D.3d 963, 964), the defendant failed to preserve this contention for appellate review (see People v McClenic, 155 A.D.3d 1064; People v Coachman, 154 A.D.3d 957). In any event, the contention is without merit, as the record reflects that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Seeber, 4 N.Y.3d 780, 780-781; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543; People v Hendrix, 172 A.D.3d 1224, 1224).
The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d at 255).
DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WOOTEN and DOWLING, JJ., concur.