Opinion
2019–07570 Ind.No. 18–00420
10-14-2020
Mary Zugibe Raleigh, Warwick, NY, for appellant. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.
Mary Zugibe Raleigh, Warwick, NY, for appellant.
David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JEFFREY A. COHEN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County ( William L. Deprospo, J.), rendered June 4, 2019, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 was sufficient because it addressed the essential issues in the case and, although the brief did not fully analyze the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal or the enforceability of the waiver, the enforceability or unenforceability of the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal makes no practical difference to the Anders outcome (see People v. Warney, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 127 N.Y.S.3d 892 [2d Dept.] ; People v. Murray, 169 A.D.3d 227, 233, 93 N.Y.S.3d 694 ). Moreover, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal (see People v. Murray, 169 A.D.3d at 233, 93 N.Y.S.3d 694 ). Accordingly, counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396 ; People v. Murray, 169 A.D.3d at 235, 93 N.Y.S.3d 694 ).
BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN, CONNOLLY and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.