From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moreno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued April 27, 2000.

June 5, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), rendered April 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Jeffrey I. Richman of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Florence M. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the court properly refused to direct the People to disclose the identity of the confidential informant and produce him for questioning. The issue of identification was not a close one and the testimony of the confidential informant would not have been relevant to guilt or innocence (see, People v. Pena, 37 N.Y.2d 642; People v. Goggins, 34 N.Y.2d 163, 170; People v. Dudley, 69 A.D.2d 888, 889).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Moreno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Moreno

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD MORENO, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 835

Citing Cases

People v. Vega

Here, the sole role of the informant was to introduce the undercover police officer to the defendant ( see…