From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1995
212 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Morales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1995
212 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JULIO MORALES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 158

Citing Cases

People v. Carter

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not…