From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moores

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2014
118 A.D.3d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-4

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michel MOORES, also known as Dorion Jackson, appellant.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.



Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, and JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated August 3, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on July 20, 2004.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.

The County Court erred in denying the defendant's motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on the ground that his status as a reincarcerated parole violator rendered him ineligible to be resentenced ( see People v. Paulin, 17 N.Y.3d 238, 242, 929 N.Y.S.2d 36, 952 N.E.2d 1028;People v. Cabrera, 103 A.D.3d 748, 959 N.Y.S.2d 534;People v. Ashby, 99 A.D.3d 931, 951 N.Y.S.2d 911;People v. Berry, 89 A.D.3d 954, 955, 933 N.Y.S.2d 94). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.


Summaries of

People v. Moores

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2014
118 A.D.3d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Moores

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michel MOORES, also known as Dorion…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 4, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
118 A.D.3d 731
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4033

Citing Cases

Weinberg v. Omar E.

Order affirmed, without cost or disbursements. The age of a putative father is irrelevant to a paternity…

Matter of Presler

" ( Sandford v. McLean, 3 Paige, 117, 121.) Respondent also argues that the instrument in question is, by its…