From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moorer

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Feb 28, 2013
B240980 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

B240980

02-28-2013

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIFFANY DANIELL MOORER, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. TA122455)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 15, 2013, be modified as follows:

1. After the first sentence in the second full paragraph on page 4, i.e., after the sentence ending "appellant had a weapon," add as footnote 3 the following footnote, which will require renumbering of all subsequent

Johnson's testimony was as follows: "[Defense Counsel:] Q You stated you did a pat down search on her for weapons; is that right? [¶] A Yes. [¶] Q Is that just something you do routinely, is pat down for weapons? [¶] A Yes. [¶] Q There was nothing else indicating that she had a weapon; is that correct? [¶] A Correct."

As appellant indicates, Johnson's testimony on this issue (see fn. 3, ante)suggests Johnson routinely conducted patdown searches absent reason to believe a defendant was armed and dangerous. However, that testimony was ambiguous and reasonably may be construed as indicating a patdown for weapons was just something Johnson routinely did, without her indicating she did so routinely absent reason to believe a defendant was armed and dangerous.

2. After the last sentence in the third full paragraph on page 10, i.e., after the sentence that ends "Johnson never so testified," add as footnote 6 the following footnote:

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

People v. Moorer

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Feb 28, 2013
B240980 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

People v. Moorer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIFFANY DANIELL MOORER, Defendant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

B240980 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2013)