From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree should be reversed because the prosecutor failed to file a special information pursuant to CPL 200.60. We disagree. Although the prosecutor did not file a special information charging that defendant was previously convicted of a specified offense, defendant admitted that he had previously been convicted of a crime and agreed to plead guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. The prosecutor's failure to file the special information was therefore waived by defendant's voluntary guilty plea ( see, People v. DiCarluccio, 168 A.D.2d 509, 510, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 877). We further conclude that defendant's sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Sprague, J. — Attempted Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Mooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Mooney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK A. MOONEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 532

Citing Cases

People v. Sapp

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate…

People v. Khan

Further, defendant's contention that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (1) is unconstitutional is without merit…