From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Montpetit

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

109743

03-14-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert W. MONTPETIT, Appellant.

Rural Law Center of New York, Castleton (Kelly L. Egan of counsel), for appellant. Gary M. Pasqua, District Attorney, Canton (Matthew L. Peabody of counsel), for respondent.


Rural Law Center of New York, Castleton (Kelly L. Egan of counsel), for appellant.

Gary M. Pasqua, District Attorney, Canton (Matthew L. Peabody of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richey, J.), rendered July 27, 2017, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted pursuant to a superior court information charging him with one count of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and one count of driving while intoxicated. Consistent with the negotiated plea agreement, defendant agreed to waive his right to appeal and pleaded guilty to both class E felonies with the understanding that, if he successfully completed a treatment program, he would be sentenced to five years of probation. Following his plea of guilty, County Court sentenced defendant, who had successfully completed treatment, to concurrent five-year terms of probation – subject to various conditions. Two months later, defendant was charged with violating certain terms of his probation, including operating a motor vehicle without a license, testing positive for cocaine and snorting oxycodone. Defendant thereafter admitted to violating his probation in exchange for a prison sentence of 1 to 3 years. Accordingly, County Court revoked defendant's probation and imposed concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years followed by a three-year conditional discharge. Defendant now appeals, contending only that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive.

Although "[d]efendant's original waiver of the right to appeal does not preclude his challenge to the resentence" ( People v. Capone, 160 A.D.3d 1221, 1221 n., 71 N.Y.S.3d 912 [2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1146, 83 N.Y.S.3d 427, 108 N.E.3d 501 [2018] ), given defendant's alcohol-related criminal history, his admitted violation of multiple conditions of his probation and the fact that the agreed-upon sentence imposed was the statutory minimum term for the two class E felonies to which defendant pleaded guilty (see Penal Law § 70.00[2][e] ; [3][b] ), we find no extraordinary circumstances or abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the promised resentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Regan, 162 A.D.3d 1414, 1415, 79 N.Y.S.3d 752 [2018] ; People v. Capone, 160 A.D.3d at 1221, 71 N.Y.S.3d 912 ). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Montpetit

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Montpetit

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT W. MONTPETIT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 14, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 1341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
170 A.D.3d 1341
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1861

Citing Cases

People v. Turner

Initially, defendant validly waived his right to appeal at the time that he pleaded guilty to the burglary…

People v. Reese

Defendant's sole argument upon appeal is that the negotiated resentence is harsh and excessive. To be sure,…