From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Montes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2001
283 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 1, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Colleen McMahon, J.), rendered June 26, 1998, as amended September 22, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and aggravated criminal contempt, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 25 to 50 years, unanimously affirmed.

FRANK GLASER, for Respondent.

PAUL WIENER, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner, Buckley, JJ.


Defendant's motion to suppress evidence was properly denied. Having arrived at the scene in immediate response to a radio message that two people had been shot, officers came upon an identified witness who said he just had heard shots and had seen a man running away. The officers took the witness into their patrol car and, after proceeding to a street two blocks from the scene upon the information of a second witness who flagged them down after seeing defendant run past, the first witness identified defendant as he was walking on the sidewalk ahead of the police vehicle. Once the patrol car drove up next to him, defendant turned around and began to walk in the opposite direction. While each of defendant's actions, standing alone, may have had an innocent explanation, the confluence of factors, including his confirmed identity as the person who fled from the scene of the shooting and his evasive action upon the officers' arrival, provided reasonable suspicion justifying the stop and brief detention of defendant (see, People v. Mendez, 255 A.D.2d 128, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 876; People v. Paul, 240 A.D.2d 168, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 909; People v. Gill, 223 A.D.2d 447,lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 1019). Therefore, the motion to suppress the identification of defendant by one of the shooting victims at a showup minutes later and defendant's subsequent statements was properly denied.

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Montes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2001
283 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Montes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT v. RADAMES MONTES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 25

Citing Cases

People v. Spears

During defendant's flight from police, Officer McClellan saw defendant drop a small black object, which…