From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 26, 1991
172 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 26, 1991

Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Evaluating the circumstances of this case in light of the five relevant factors identified by the Court of Appeals in People v. Taranovich ( 37 N.Y.2d 442), we conclude that defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We note that the extent of the delay was neither unusual nor unreasonable, that defendant was responsible for most of the delay between his arraignment and his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, and that defendant did not allege or establish any prejudice to his defense as a result of the delay in prosecution.


Summaries of

People v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 26, 1991
172 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Monroe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NORMAN MONROE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)