From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Monforte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1992
183 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On October 15, 1987, at approximately 11:50 A.M., Police Officer Joseph Aiello and his partner received a radio call that two white males were sitting in a brown vehicle at a specified location using drugs. The radio call was the product of information given to police by an undisclosed civilian. Upon arriving at the specified location, the officers observed a brown Cadillac containing two white males, parked with two wheels on the sidewalk.

The officers alighted from the police vehicle and approached the Cadillac from behind, with the intention of issuing a summons for illegal parking. Officer Aiello, approaching on the passenger side of the Cadillac, could see directly in the vehicle's interior through a wide-open window. The defendant was seated in the driver's seat and his codefendant was in the passenger seat. Upon requesting the vehicle's registration, Officer Aiello observed a clear, plastic, zip lock bag containing a white substance situated between the occupants of the vehicle. The officers removed the occupants and, in doing so, observed a .38 caliber handgun on the floor of the vehicle. Both suspects were placed under arrest and a subsequent inventory search produced a large quantity of cocaine in various packages, and assorted drug paraphernalia.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the physical evidence. The specificity and congruity between the information provided by the anonymous tip and the circumstances actually encountered authorized the police to approach the parked vehicle to inquire (see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181; People v Russ, 61 N.Y.2d 693, 694-695; People v. Batash, 163 A.D.2d 399, 400; People v. Hawkins, 161 A.D.2d 802, 803). In any event, it was clearly within the police officers' authority to approach an illegally parked vehicle so as to enforce the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see, People v. Solano, 179 A.D.2d 791; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 401). Since the police officers peered into the vehicle from a lawful vantage point, they were justified in seizing contraband which came into their plain view (see, Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 446; People v Manganaro, 176 A.D.2d 354; People v. Baldanza, 138 A.D.2d 722, 723). Moreover, contrary to the defendant's contention, the viewing of a clear, plastic, zip lock bag containing white powder by a police officer trained and experienced in the field of narcotics, gave the police probable cause to arrest him (see, People v. Ricciardi, 149 A.D.2d 742, 743). Sullivan, J.P., Harwood, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Monforte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1992
183 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Monforte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GREGORY MONFORTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Diaz

We find unpersuasive the defendant's contention that the police acted unlawfully in approaching the vehicle…

People v. Bowen–Allen

The defendant's present contentions that he was arrested without probable cause and that the showup…