Opinion
2021–02926 Ind. No. 1633/11
02-23-2022
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Compton MOHABIR, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the memorandum), for respondent.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the memorandum), for respondent.
BETSY BARROS, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ushir Pandit–Durant, J.), imposed April 12, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v. Mohabir, 192 A.D.3d 1047, 141 N.Y.S.3d 315 ), on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the resentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
The period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the resentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
BARROS, J.P., ROMAN, CHRISTOPHER and DOWLING, JJ., concur.