From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mirdita

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1997
236 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

February 27, 1997.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered June 22, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of defendant's intent to use the weapon unlawfully, notwithstanding his acquittal on the other counts of the indictment ( People v Russell, 227 AD2d 232, lv denied 88 NY2d 969).

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by alleged prosecutorial misconduct. Such misconduct, if any, was harmless error in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt ( People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Villarino, 184 AD2d 475, lv denied 80 NY2d 977).

We find that defendant's sentence was properly imposed and we perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.


Summaries of

People v. Mirdita

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1997
236 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Mirdita

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR MIRDITA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1997

Citations

236 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Mirdita v. City of N.Y.

Therefore, Plaintiff says, the 1994 attack upon him was clearly foreseeable. Plaintiff was convicted of…

Mirdita v. City of New York

Therefore, Plaintiff says, the 1994 attack upon him was clearly foreseeable. Plaintiff was convicted of…