Opinion
No. 2016-13221 Ind. No. 2551/14
02-01-2023
The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Chauncey Miranda, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Ryan Miller of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Jonathan E. Maseng on the memorandum), for respondent.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Ryan Miller of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Jonathan E. Maseng on the memorandum), for respondent.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P. ROBERT J. MILLER DEBORAH A. DOWLING BARRY E. WARHIT, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kenneth C. Holder, J.), imposed November 28, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the People's contention, the record does not establish that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257). The defendant's written waiver of the right to appeal misstated the applicable law and was misleading (see People v Nicholson, ___ A.D.3d ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 07079, *1 [2d Dept]; People v Green, 205 A.D.3d 1051, 1052). The Supreme Court's oral colloquy was insufficient to cure the defects of the written waiver (see People v Bisono, 36 N.Y.3d 1013, 1017-1018; People v Green, 205 A.D.3d at 1052). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim.
However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
DUFFY, J.P., MILLER, DOWLING and WARHIT, JJ., concur.