From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Minutoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1987
128 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 23, 1987

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting the provision that the Department of Probation shall determine the manner of making restitution. As so modified, the sentence is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for a determination by the sentencing court of the manner in which the defendant shall make restitution.

Penal Law § 60.27 (1) provides that a court, when imposing a sentence, may require a defendant to make restitution of the fruits of his offense. When restitution is required, the court must fix not only the amount thereof but also the manner of performance (see, People v. Fuller, 57 N.Y.2d 152; People v Julye, 64 A.D.2d 614; People v. Thigpen, 60 A.D.2d 860). As the sentencing court here delegated that duty to the Department of Probation, remittitur is required so that the sentencing court may determine the manner in which the defendant shall make restitution.

We have considered the defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Minutoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1987
128 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Minutoli

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL MINUTOLI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Bernstein

In each instance, we affirm. It is conceded that the court erred in failing to specify the manner of…