From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Minkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1916
176 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

December, 1916.


Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county reversed, and new trial ordered, because of the violation of defendant's constitutional rights in calling his attorney and trial counsel to the witness stand, and, in the presence of the jury, demanding that he produce certain incrimination papers. ( People v. Gibson, 218 N.Y. 70.) In People v. Dolan ( 186 N.Y. 4), relied on by respondent, no such objection was raised or passed upon, either during the trial or in the reviewing courts. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.


Summaries of

People v. Minkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1916
176 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

People v. Minkowitz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE MINKOWITZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1916

Citations

176 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)