From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Milon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 7, 2014
114 A.D.3d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-7

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin MILON, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D'Amico, J.), rendered September 4, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree. The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Barbara J. Davies of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David Panepinto of Counsel), for Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D'Amico, J.), rendered September 4, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.
The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Barbara J. Davies of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David Panepinto of Counsel), for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20[1] ). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence because “[t]he plea colloquy fails to establish that defendant knowingly and intelligently waived [his] right to appeal the severity of [his] sentence” (People v. Maracle, 19 N.Y.3d 925, 927, 950 N.Y.S.2d 498, 973 N.E.2d 1272). We nevertheless reject defendant's contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We note, however, that the record reflects that defendant is a predicate felon and thus the People were required to file a predicate felony offender statement in accordance with CPL 400.21 and, if appropriate, County Court was required to sentence defendant as a second felony offender ( see People v. Stubbs, 96 A.D.3d 1448, 1450, 946 N.Y.S.2d 370, lv. denied 19 N.Y.3d 1001, 951 N.Y.S.2d 478, 975 N.E.2d 924). Because we cannot permit an illegal sentence to stand ( see id.), we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for the filing of a predicate felony offender statement and resentencing in accordance with the law ( see id.).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for the filing of a predicate felony offender statement and resentencing. SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Milon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 7, 2014
114 A.D.3d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Milon

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin MILON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 7, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 746
979 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

People v. Ware

Defendant's contentions that, during the robbery trial, the court erred in refusing to admit his…

People v. Arney

Here, defendant failed to assert his innocence or raise a possible intoxication defense at sentencing when…