From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Miller

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1977
362 N.E.2d 256 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1977

Decided February 15, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, IVAN WARNER, J.

Patrick M. Wall for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Stephen R. Bookin of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

It was flagrant misconduct for the trial prosecutor to elicit the response that the defendant was the source of the heroin for the possession of which the witness Williams had been convicted in an unrelated case. In view of the Trial Judge's prompt curative instructions to the jury and trial counsel's express declination to move for a mistrial, the error, if that it be, was waived and a deliberate choice made to proceed with the trial. We have reviewed the other matters raised by the defendant and find them to either lack merit or constitute harmless error.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Miller

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1977
362 N.E.2d 256 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN MILLER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 15, 1977

Citations

362 N.E.2d 256 (N.Y. 1977)
362 N.E.2d 256
393 N.Y.S.2d 705

Citing Cases

People v. Washko

The prosecutor offered certain documents as business records, and after defense counsel's cross-examination…

People v. Vinson

Before: Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Lerner, Saxe, JJ. Defendant's claim under Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79)…