Opinion
Argued March 14, 2000.
April 20, 2000.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered July 3, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Allen Fallek of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Shulamit Rosenblum of counsel), for respondent.
LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( CPL 470.15[5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80 ).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Antonio, 255 A.D.2d 449 ), and in any event, is without merit.