From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mieles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Prior to jury selection, the defendant signed a waiver giving up his right to be present during sidebar conferences in which prospective jurors were questioned about their qualifications. On this appeal, the defendant alleges that he was denied his right to be present at all material stages of the trial because he was not present at the sidebar conferences when the attorneys informed the trial court of challenges for cause and peremptory challenges. Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that the defendant was not denied his right to be present at all material stages of the trial ( see, People v. Velasco, 77 N.Y.2d 469). While the defendant was not present at the sidebar conference when challenges were discussed, he was present during voir dire and when the challenges were effectuated in open court ( see, People v. Velasco, supra; People v. Kaur, 204 A.D.2d 573).

The defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation are unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Simms, 222 A.D.2d 622). In any event, any error in the prosecutor's summation was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt ( see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mieles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1998
254 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Mieles

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN MIELES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 262

Citing Cases

Prendergast v. Rivera

" A review of New York case law demonstrates that this contention is accurate: both the Court of Appeals, in…

People v. Green

Defendant's course of conduct supports the inference that when he put an unknown object into his mouth, he…