From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 1968
30 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

May 6, 1968


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18, 1967, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable ( People v. Holmes, 27 A.D.2d 843). Further, coram nobis is not a proper remedy to raise the question of an improperly accepted guilty plea where the facts giving rise to such claim appear on the face of the record (see People v. Sadness, 300 N.Y. 69). In any event, if the merits of defendant's claim were properly before us, we would hold that his version of the circumstances surrounding the commission of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, to which he offered to plead guilty, did establish his guilt thereof (cf. People v. Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 1968
30 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Miele

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM PAUL MIELE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 6, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

People v. Sokolowski

This court will not consider the second point in appellant's brief, which is concerned with appellant's…

People v. Flushing Hosp

The defendant is precluded from raising these objections in a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, since the basis…