From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Middleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted August 18, 2000.

November 21, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), imposed October 4, 1999, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Kathleen O'Leary of counsel; Rosemarie Barretta on the memorandum), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record fails to establish that the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283; People v. McCaskell, 206 A.D.2d 547). Accordingly, he is not foreclosed from obtaining appellate review of his sentence. We conclude that the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Middleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Middleton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. CLYDE MIDDLETON, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 884