From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mian

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Mar 15, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2010–3330 Q CR.

2013-03-15

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Khursh MIAN, Appellant.


Present: PESCE, P.J., RIOS and SOLOMON, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Cesar Quinones, J.H.O.), rendered September 23, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of violating Administrative Code of the City of New York § 15–216(a).

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is reversed, on the law, the accusatory instrument is dismissed, and the fine, if paid, is remitted.

After a nonjury trial, the judicial hearing officer convicted defendant, initially charged with disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20[1] ), of violating Administrative Code of the City of New York § 15–216(a). For the reasons stated in People v. Robinson (36 Misc.3d 158[A], 2012 N.Y. Slip Op 51807[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2012] ), the judgment of conviction is reversed, the accusatory instrument is dismissed, and the fine, if paid, is remitted.

PESCE, P.J., RIOS and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mian

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Mar 15, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Mian

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Khursh Mian, Appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Mar 15, 2013

Citations

39 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 50412
971 N.Y.S.2d 74

Citing Cases

People v. Ramirez

After a nonjury trial, the judicial hearing officer convicted defendant, who was charged solely with…