From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Merete

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1991
171 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 7, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Emily Goodman, J.).


On August 2, 1988, the defendant was seen by one of the arresting officers with the clearly defined outline of a gun at his waistband. Both the officers testified as to the defendant's unusual action in taking the towel from an ice cream vendor's cart in an attempt to cover the gun outline under his shirt.

Where there is a defined bulge in the outline or configuration of a gun, a search pursuant to CPL 140.50 is proper. (People v Taveras, 155 A.D.2d 131, appeal dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 871; People v Blackman, 61 A.D.2d 916.) The testimony at the suppression hearing raised credibility issues and upon this record we find no reason to interfere with the hearing court's factual findings.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Merete

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1991
171 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Merete

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PEDRO MERETE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 22

Citing Cases

People v. Rasberry

Defendant's motion to suppress the gun was properly denied. The initial approach of the police officers…