From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Merejildo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 18, 2003
308 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1609

September 18, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered May 11, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, 6 years to life and 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Mark H. Goldey, for respondent.

David J. Klem, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Marlow, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for an adjournment of his trial for the purpose of retaining a new attorney. The application was unsupported by a showing of good cause and the substitution of newly retained counsel would have resulted in an unwarranted and prolonged delay of the trial (see People v. Arroyave, 49 N.Y.2d 264). Furthermore, defendant's retained counsel provided effective assistance throughout the proceedings (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714), and there was no conflict of interest affecting his representation of defendant. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining contentions.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Merejildo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 18, 2003
308 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Merejildo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE MEREJILDO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 18, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

People v. Bullock

or, 164 AD2d 953, 954-956, lv denied 76 NY2d 991. It thus cannot be said that defendant's conduct in…