Opinion
November 25, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial due to the court's charge on consciousness of guilt has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 248-252). In any event, the court conveyed to the jury the correct legal standard regarding the evidence to be considered as consciousness of guilt (see, People v. Whaley, 144 A.D.2d 510).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J.P., Harwood, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.