From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 18, 2021
37 N.Y.3d 1075 (N.Y. 2021)

Opinion

No. 88 SSM 27

11-18-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene MENDOZA, Appellant.

Patricia Pazner, Appellate Advocates, New York City (David Fitzmaurice of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (William H. Branigan of counsel), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, Appellate Advocates, New York City (David Fitzmaurice of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (William H. Branigan of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings. Under the totality of the circumstances and upon the People's concession, defendant's appeal waiver was invalid and therefore did not foreclose consideration of his harsh and excessive sentence claim (see People v. Bisono, 36 N.Y.3d 1013, 1017–1018, 140 N.Y.S.3d 433, 164 N.E.3d 239 [2020] ).

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 18, 2021
37 N.Y.3d 1075 (N.Y. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene MENDOZA…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

37 N.Y.3d 1075 (N.Y. 2021)
155 N.Y.S.3d 11
176 N.E.3d 1053

Citing Cases

People v. Mendoza

By decision and order dated November 13, 2019, this Court affirmed the sentences (see People v Mendoza, 177…

People v. Mendoza

By decision and order dated November 13, 2019, this Court affirmed the sentences (see People v Mendoza, 177…