From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Meeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2010
72 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2006-04051.

April 13, 2010.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 25, 2008 ( People v Meeks, 56 AD3d 800), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 12, 2006.

Radcliffe Meeks, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Sharon Y. Brodt, and Roni C. Pilani of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Skelos and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Meeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2010
72 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Meeks

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RADCLIFFE MEEKS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3150
898 N.Y.S.2d 489

Citing Cases

Meeks v. Artus

Denying petitioner's application for a writ of error coram nobis, the Appellate Division held that he "had…