From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Medina

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Sep 24, 1935
9 Cal.App.2d 259 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Docket No. 2781.

September 24, 1935.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. William Tell Aggeler, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Gladys Towles Root for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Bayard Rhone, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


The defendant appeals from a conviction of rape. [1] The sole contention of the defendant is that the waiver of a trial by jury was made after the court had started to impanel the jury and that the court could not try the case thereafter without a jury. The impaneling of the jury had not been completed. Article I, section 7, of the Constitution, as amended in 1928, among other things, provides: ". . . A trial by jury may be waived in all criminal cases, by the consent of both parties, expressed in open court by the defendant and his counsel." The defendant does not contend that the waiver was not made in due form but only that it was made too late. There is nothing in the Constitution which requires that the waiver be made before the court starts to impanel the jury, and there is no basis in common sense or morals for the defendant's contention.

Judgment affirmed.

Wood, J., and Gould, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Medina

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Sep 24, 1935
9 Cal.App.2d 259 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

People v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ARTHUR MEDINA, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Sep 24, 1935

Citations

9 Cal.App.2d 259 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
49 P.2d 332

Citing Cases

People v. Mosley

) The decision may even be made after the selection of the jury has begun. (People v. Medina (1935) 9…

People v. King

[2] A defendant may waive a jury trial and submit to a decision of a court based upon a transcript of the…