From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Medina

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Oct 9, 2015
132 A.D.3d 1363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

995 KA 10-00808.

10-09-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan C. MEDINA, Defendant–Appellant.

Charles J. Greenberg, Amherst, for Defendant–Appellant. Cindy F. Intschert, District Attorney, Watertown (Nicole L. Kyle of Counsel), for Respondent.


Charles J. Greenberg, Amherst, for Defendant–Appellant.

Cindy F. Intschert, District Attorney, Watertown (Nicole L. Kyle of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 205.25[2] ). The record of the plea proceeding establishes that County Court failed to apprise defendant, a noncitizen, that deportation was a potential consequence of his guilty plea. As defendant contends and the People correctly concede, the case should be remitted to afford defendant “the opportunity to move to vacate his plea upon a showing that there is a ‘reasonable probability’ that he would not have pleaded guilty had the court advised him of the possibility of deportation” ( People v. Fermin, 123 A.D.3d 465, 466, 998 N.Y.S.2d 180, quoting People v. Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168, 198, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617 ). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court for that purpose. Defendant further contends that counsel was ineffective in failing to inform him that deportation was a potential consequence of the plea (see Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 ). Inasmuch as that contention is based upon matters outside the record, it must be raised in a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see People v. Drammeh, 100 A.D.3d 650, 651, 953 N.Y.S.2d 274, lv. denied 20 N.Y.3d 1098, 965 N.Y.S.2d 793, 988 N.E.2d 531 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Jefferson County Court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

People v. Medina

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Oct 9, 2015
132 A.D.3d 1363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JUAN C. MEDINA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 1363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
17 N.Y.S.3d 258
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 7374

Citing Cases

People v. Jumale

Here, the record of the plea proceeding establishes that the court failed to fulfill that obligation (seeid.…

People v. Sheppard

Defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review inasmuch as he did not move to withdraw his plea…