From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 2005
18 A.D.3d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6006.

May 5, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan C. Sudolnik, J.), rendered October 9, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ., concur.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The value of the car in question was properly established by the testimony of an expert appraiser, in combination with testimony concerning the car's condition that was provided by the owner and by a police officer who observed the car ( see People v. Jamison, 278 AD2d 100, lv denied 96 NY2d 784; People v. Callendar, 260 AD2d 315, lv denied 93 NY2d 1015).

Defendant's argument concerning the court's charge is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it.


Summaries of

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 2005
18 A.D.3d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWIN MEDINA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 5, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
794 N.Y.S.2d 367

Citing Cases

In Matter of Axsel L., XXXX

The testimony of an expert appraiser in combination with the testimony concerning the car's condition will be…