Opinion
05-24-2017
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Quincy McQUAID, appellant.
Gerald Zuckerman, Croton–on–Hudson, NY, for appellant. Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Jennifer Spencer and Laurie Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.
Gerald Zuckerman, Croton–on–Hudson, NY, for appellant.
Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Jennifer Spencer and Laurie Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered March 24, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the verdict finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree but not guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree was legally repugnant is without merit. Viewing the verdict solely in terms of the elements as charged to the jury (see People v. DeLee, 24 N.Y.3d 603, 608, 2 N.Y.S.3d 382, 26 N.E.3d 210 ; People v. Muhammad, 17 N.Y.3d 532, 542, 935 N.Y.S.2d 526, 959 N.E.2d 463 ; People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, 6, 447 N.Y.S.2d 132, 431 N.E.2d 617 ), the acquittal on the count of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30[1] ) did not negate any of the elements of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15[4] ) of which the defendant was convicted (see People v. Weaver, 195 A.D.2d 1019, 1019, 601 N.Y.S.2d 896 ; People v. Price, 129 A.D.2d 745, 746, 514 N.Y.S.2d 505 ; People v. Barry, 100 A.D.2d 803, 804, 474 N.Y.S.2d 731 ; People v. Jackson, 69 A.D.2d 823, 824, 415 N.Y.S.2d 45 ).
The defendant further contends that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5] ; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053 ; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902 ).
LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, LaSALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.