Opinion
September 18, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenges to various remarks made by the prosecutor during trial and summation are unpreserved for appellate review inasmuch as no objections were raised to any of the comments in question (see, CPL 470.05; People v Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858; People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818; People v Haramura, 186 A.D.2d 676; People v Sansevero, 185 A.D.2d 256; People v Okon, 184 A.D.2d 664). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v Russo, 201 A.D.2d 512, affd 85 N.Y.2d 872; People v Smith, 199 A.D.2d 439).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Copertino, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.