From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McMillan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1991
177 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 25, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant contends that his plea allocution was not sufficient because he did not admit that he committed the essential elements of the crime. However, we find that the defendant's claim is precluded because a defendant who accepts a bargained-for plea to a lesser offense than that charged in the indictment may not challenge the factual basis for the plea (see, People v. Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 108; People v. McVay, 148 A.D.2d 474). In any event, we find that the factual recitation was legally sufficient.

The defendant also contends that the court erred when it refused to permit him to withdraw his guilty plea without conducting a more thorough inquiry to ensure that his plea was made knowingly and voluntarily. However, a review of the record reveals that the court did conduct a sufficient inquiry into the basis of the defendant's application and properly found the application to be without merit (see, People v. Colon, 114 A.D.2d 967). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McMillan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1991
177 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. McMillan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRUCE McMILLAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)