From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKnight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 7, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence and statements made to the police. While investigating a 911 report of a burglar alarm at an apartment building, police officers legally entered defendant's apartment and observed but did not seize two loaded automatic weapons as well as cocaine and scales. Based on their observations, they obtained a search warrant. Although a warrantless search and seizure generally is presumed to be unreasonable ( see, People v. Hodge, 44 N.Y.2d 553, 557), here the officers had reasonable grounds to believe that there was an emergency at the apartment requiring their. immediate assistance for the protection of life or property; thus, the initial entry was not motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence ( see, People v. Mitchell, 39 N.Y.2d 173, 177-179, cert denied 426 U.S. 953).


Summaries of

People v. McKnight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. McKnight

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AMEER McKNIGHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 7, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 832

Citing Cases

Steinmetz v. State

committed at appellant's residence where a security alarm had been activated, no answer was received by the…

People v. Samuel

Contrary to defendant's further contention, "the danger [that created the emergency] did not abate during the…