From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no basis in the record to disturb the trial court's determination to seat two prospective jurors after its finding that the defense counsel's explanation for challenging those jurors had a discriminatory intent (see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79; People v. Allen, 86 A.D.2d 101; People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, affd 500 U.S. 352).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McKinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BILLY McKINNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 487

Citing Cases

McKinney v. Artuz

By decision and order dated October 10, 1995, a four-judge panel affirmed his conviction, concluding, inter…