From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKinney

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 1300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-31

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vanessa McKINNEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester, Covington & Burling LLP, New York City (Brian D. Ginsberg of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for Respondent.


Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester, Covington & Burling LLP, New York City (Brian D. Ginsberg of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her following a jury trial of, inter alia, leaving the scene of a personal injury incident as a class D felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600[2][a] ). As defendant contends, and the People correctly conceded at oral argument of this appeal, the indictment as filed charged defendant with only a class E felony under section 600(2)(a), for having caused “serious physical injury” to the victim, and thus Supreme Court erred in granting the People's oral motion at trial to amend the indictment to allege that the victim died, thereby raising the offense to a class D felony ( see § 600[2][c] ). Because the People proved at trial beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant left the scene of a personal injury incident that resulted in serious physical injury to another person, we modify the judgment by reducing the conviction from a class D felony to a class E felony. Inasmuch as defendant has already served the maximum term of imprisonment permitted for the class E felony, there is no need to remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing on count one ( see People v. Jackson, 269 A.D.2d 867, 703 N.Y.S.2d 804, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 798, 711 N.Y.S.2d 166, 733 N.E.2d 238). Rather, in the interest of judicial economy, we instead further modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed on count one and by imposing the maximum allowed for a class E felony, i.e., an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 1/3 to 4 years.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the conviction of leaving the scene of a personal injury incident without reporting as a class D felony under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600(2) to leaving the scene of a personal injury incident without reporting as a class E felony and by vacating the sentence imposed on count one of the indictment and imposing a sentence of 1 1/3 to 4 years on that count and as modified the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. McKinney

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 1300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vanessa McKINNEY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 1300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
937 N.Y.S.2d 507
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 568

Citing Cases

People v. Santiago

We further conclude, however, that the evidence is legally sufficient to support a conviction of the lesser…

People v. Santiago

We further conclude, however, that the evidence is legally sufficient to support a conviction of the lesser…