Opinion
February 10, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McNab, J.).
Judgments affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his objections to his guilty pleas (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Braxton, 114 A.D.2d 855). In any event, his plea allocutions satisfied the standard established in People v Harris ( 61 N.Y.2d 9) and sufficiently established the elements of the crimes to which he pleaded guilty (see, People v. Braxton, supra; People v. Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944). Although defendant was initially reluctant to admit certain criminal conduct, the record establishes that he thereafter made satisfactory factual allocutions, which were voluntary and made upon consultation with counsel.
Finally, the record of the Huntley hearing fully supports Criminal Term's denial of defendant's motion to suppress his statement, which was clearly spontaneous (see, People v. Porter, 110 A.D.2d 662). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.