From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKanney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 30, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Koch, J.), rendered April 23, 1996, convicting him of murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Ritter, J.P., Santucci, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that he was prejudiced by the admission into evidence of ammunition found in his home which matched that found at the crime scene ( see, People v. Goldring, 243 A.D.2d 578; People v. Blair, 186 A.D.2d 665).

The defendant's contention, made in his pro se brief, that he was denied the right to be present at a material stage of the trial, cannot be reviewed since he failed to make a sufficient record in this regard ( see, People v. Ruggiero, 251 A.D.2d 685; People v. Roman, 217 A.D.2d 473).


Summaries of

People v. McKanney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. McKanney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. MALIK McKANNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 820

Citing Cases

People v. Murray

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the photograph of the gun allegedly…

People v. Murray

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the photograph of the gun allegedly…